Katherine Apps KC
39 Essex Chambers
Barrister (England and Wales/N.I.)
Regions
- London
81 Chancery Lane, London, WC2A 1DD, United Kingdom
Katherine.Apps [at] 39essex.com
http://www.littletonchambers.com/barristers/juniors/katherine-apps.aspx
Katherine joined Littleton Chambers in 2007. Having completed a stage with the Cabinet of Judge Schiemann at the CJEU in 2006, Katherine has a particular interest in EU issues in employment and labour law. Her key cases include:
- R (on the application of G) v X School and Y City Council [2011] UKSC 30; [2011] IRLR 756: right to legal representation at an internal employment disciplinary hearing under Article 6 ECHR (Supreme Court and Court of Appeal).
- Small & others v Boots Plc - [2009] IRLR 328. TUPE case concerning a profit share bonus scheme and TUPE. Transfer of the implied term of mutual trust and confidence
British Airline Pilots Association v British Airways - High Court expedited trial (May 2008).The first trial concerning the scope of trade unions right to strike and the free movement provisions of the EC Treaty since the ECJ
judgments in Viking and Laval.
Attorney General’s C Panel of Counsel.
Equality and Human Rights Commission Approved Panel.
- R (on the application of G) v X School and Y City Council [2011] UKSC 30; [2011] IRLR 756: right to legal representation at an internal employment disciplinary hearing under Article 6 ECHR (Supreme Court and Court of Appeal).
- Small & others v Boots Plc - [2009] IRLR 328. TUPE case concerning a profit share bonus scheme and TUPE. Transfer of the implied term of mutual trust and confidence
British Airline Pilots Association v British Airways - High Court expedited trial (May 2008).The first trial concerning the scope of trade unions right to strike and the free movement provisions of the EC Treaty since the ECJ
judgments in Viking and Laval.
Attorney General’s C Panel of Counsel.
Equality and Human Rights Commission Approved Panel.
Disclaimer: ELA members self-certify that they are qualified lawyers and practice employment law for at least 25% of their time. ELA is not a regulatory body and does not vouch for the quality of service of any member appearing in the membership directory. A member’s inclusion in the directory does not constitute any kind of recommendation.